This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalized service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. You can learn more about our use of cookies and similar technologies and your choices by reviewing our Privacy Policy. By clicking “I agree” you agree to our use of cookies and similar technologies.
When Enforcement Agencies Should Decide to Appoint a Monitor
Bart M Schwartz, Chris Arkin, and Andrew J O’Connell, share their expertise in the GIR Guide to Monitorships – Fourth Edition. Their chapter, “When Enforcement Agencies Should Decide to Appoint a Monitor,” dives into mechanisms for imposing #monitors, types of #monitorships, which agencies impose monitorships, #DOJ guidance on monitors and the selection process.
Accreditation: This article was first published on Global Investigations Review in May 2024; for further in-depth analysis, please visit GIR The Guide to Monitorships – 4th Edition.
Bart M Schwartz
Co-Founder and Chairman
Described by The New York Times as the person “often sought out in…thorny situations,” Bart M. Schwartz is a founder and the chairman of Guidepost Solutions, where he provides compliance, ethics, and integrity monitoring and investigative services. He is a former Chief of the Criminal Division of the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York. For more than 30 years, Mr. Schwartz has managed sensitive and complex matters for a wide array of clients including government agencies, international corporations, and not-for-profits.
Andrew J. O'Connell
Co-Founder and President, Investigations + Private Client Protection
Mr. O’Connell oversees and conducts private investigations and security assessments throughout the United States and the world. He specializes in the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other government enforcement investigations, corporate internal investigations, civil and criminal litigation support, IP matters, and business intelligence.
InvestigationHotlines