Our Blog

How Will the Biden Administration’s Trade Policy Impact Exports of Strategic Importance? Tips for Navigating the Waters

Scot Rittenberg | JUNE 14, 2021


With administration change comes policy change. As the Biden administration continues to implement its policies, we are seeing a changing view on sales of U.S. strategic goods to foreign entities.

Specifically, as reported by Reuters, the Biden administration will “…’reprioritize’ other factors including U.S. national security, human rights and nonproliferation….,” in addition to economic security with relation to exports of weapons and strategic goods. In addition, the administration will look more favorably at strategic goods exports that are defensive versus offensive in nature. “Biden’s posture towards arms exports – specifically around reducing weapons used to attack others … means fewer bullets, bombs and missiles, while security products like radars, surveillance equipment and defenses against attacks get the green light.”

With relation to the export of controlled commodities, the administration has tightened controls on these exports to China. As reported in The Washington Post, “The Biden administration placed seven Chinese firms and government labs under U.S. export controls Thursday for their involvement in China’s effort to build supercomputers that help develop nuclear and other advanced military weapons. The listing of the firms and labs means they may not use U.S.-origin technology without a Commerce Department license, which is very difficult to obtain. ‘These are parties that are acting in ways that are contrary to our national security interests,’ said a senior agency official, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the matter’s sensitivity. ‘This is really about not having U.S. items contribute to China’s advancement of its military capabilities.’”

As part of the administration’s effort the White House issued a 100 Day Reviews report titled Resilient Supply Chains, Revitalizing American Manufacturing, and Fostering Broad-Base Growth, 100-Day Reviews under Executive Order 14017. The report calls for “…establishment of a U.S. Trade Representative-led trade strike force to identify unfair foreign trade practices that have eroded U.S. critical supply chains and to recommend trade actions to address such practices.” The trade strike force approach would “…be incorporated into the U.S. trade policy approach towards China.”

The administration’s position will lead to heightened scrutiny by U.S. government agencies of munitions and technology exports, especially where China is involved. One goal of the task force should be assuring appropriate classification and export licensing requirements are employed and enforced on all potential exports of strategic importance. To measure the success in meeting the goal, the administration must prevent a repeat of the mid 1990s incidents during which Hughes, Loral and Lockheed Martin provided controlled technology, specifically related to satellite and payload launch vehicles to China contrary to US export controls.

Navigating the waters to lawfully export strategic goods can be a cumbersome process. For those engaging or considering engaging in the export of items of strategic importance, there are a number of questions that should be proactively addressed by your general counsel or compliance officer. In certain cases, it may make sense to engage outside export compliance consultants.

 

This post is tagged: Compliance, Exports, Trade Policy

Scot Rittenberg

Scot Rittenberg

Managing Director

Scot R. Rittenberg brings a wealth of experience to the Immigration and Border Services practice at Guidepost Solutions, with an additional focus on export controls and BSA/AML consulting. He served for more than thirty years as a Special Agent with the Department of Homeland Security and the United States Customs Service. He operated as the second in command of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). During his tenure, OPR created and implemented an expedited contractor preliminary clearance process for critical agency contracts; developed and implemented the agency’s Insider Threat Program that successfully identified individuals attempting to exploit both physical and logical access vulnerabilities; established a threat management process; and increased the success rate of timely and thorough misconduct investigations.